This is a rant about art. More specifically, people's reaction to art. Now this is something that gets me very irritated but I shall try and keep this brief as it is not about wine.
We own a couple of display cases with ceramics on them. One has Sarah-Jane Selwood stuff in it:
Look at that stuff, really top bunny. The other display case has work by a variety of ceramicists in it:
From time to time we will score a new piece and when someone visits I will invariably whip it out to show them. Normally this will generate the response, "What is it for?"
We also have a new object d'art sitting on the wall in the hall. It is a metal construction:
When I show people this they say, "What is it supposed to be?"*
Now, these responses make me worry about the people I know. Are the people I like so utterly functional and devoid of feeling that they think everything has to have a use and everything has to be representational. Everything you buy doesn't have to have a specific purpose, unless you count 'pleasing you' as a purpose. Similarly, everything that doesn't have a use doesn't have to be a china representation of a dog but instead can be a form that pleases you. That is enough of a form or a use, that it makes you happy; if that is true all is well.
*I find this question so depressing I've been trying to answer it as facetiously as possible, this object is normally termed a 'wall minge'.
Powered by: newtelligence dasBlog 2.1.8102.813
Disclaimer When it comes to wine there is an objective reality out there and I know what it is.
© Copyright 2009, David Strange
E-mail